get shift-reset from scsh and modify it to be thread-local
This commit is contained in:
parent
93b2ab23b1
commit
793ee8cc2f
|
@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
|
||||||
|
; no copyright notice
|
||||||
|
; out from the scsh package: scheme/misc/shift-reset.scm
|
||||||
|
; with the mentioned modifications
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
; ,open signals escapes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
; Changes by Andreas Bernauer:
|
||||||
|
; make *META-CONTINUATION* thread-local
|
||||||
|
;
|
||||||
|
; ,open thread-cells
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
; Changes by jar:
|
||||||
|
; Added Uses of Scheme 48's WITH-CONTINUATION primitive, so that unreachable
|
||||||
|
; continuations can be reclaimed by the GC.
|
||||||
|
;
|
||||||
|
; Renamed reset-thunk -> *reset
|
||||||
|
; call/ct -> *shift
|
||||||
|
;
|
||||||
|
; Note: the meta-continuation ought to be thread-specific.
|
||||||
|
; Alternatively, the threads package could be defined in terms of
|
||||||
|
; shift and reset. This would have the advantage of making the threads
|
||||||
|
; package itself re-entrant. It would be nice to rehabilitate the
|
||||||
|
; runnable-threads queue, currently a piece of global state, as local
|
||||||
|
; to a particular invocation of WITH-MULTITASKING.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
;Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1993 13:54:52 +0100
|
||||||
|
;From: Olivier Danvy <danvy@daimi.aau.dk>
|
||||||
|
;To: jar@martigny.ai.mit.edu
|
||||||
|
;Subject: little Christmas gift
|
||||||
|
;Reply-To: danvy@daimi.aau.dk
|
||||||
|
;
|
||||||
|
;Hi again:
|
||||||
|
;
|
||||||
|
;Here is a contribution for the Scheme48 library: the shift and reset
|
||||||
|
;operators from "Abstracting Control" (LFP90) and "Representing Control"
|
||||||
|
;(MSCS92). In his POPL94 paper, Andrzej Filinski observed that since the
|
||||||
|
;meta-continuation is single-threaded, it can be globalized in a
|
||||||
|
;register. Andrzej has programmed this both in SML and in Scheme. I
|
||||||
|
;only have prettified the Scheme definition a wee bit.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
(define-syntax reset
|
||||||
|
(syntax-rules ()
|
||||||
|
((_ ?e) (*reset (lambda () ?e)))))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
(define-syntax shift
|
||||||
|
(syntax-rules ()
|
||||||
|
((_ ?k ?e) (*shift (lambda (?k) ?e)))))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
(define *meta-continuation*
|
||||||
|
(make-thread-cell
|
||||||
|
(lambda (v)
|
||||||
|
(error "You forgot the top-level reset..."))))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
(define *abort
|
||||||
|
(lambda (thunk)
|
||||||
|
(with-continuation null-continuation ;JAR hack
|
||||||
|
(lambda ()
|
||||||
|
(let ((val (thunk)))
|
||||||
|
((thread-cell-ref *meta-continuation*) val))))))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
(define null-continuation #f)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
(define *reset
|
||||||
|
(lambda (thunk)
|
||||||
|
(let ((mc (thread-cell-ref *meta-continuation*)))
|
||||||
|
(call-with-current-continuation
|
||||||
|
(lambda (k)
|
||||||
|
(begin
|
||||||
|
(thread-cell-set!
|
||||||
|
*meta-continuation*
|
||||||
|
(lambda (v)
|
||||||
|
(thread-cell-set! *meta-continuation* mc)
|
||||||
|
(k v)))
|
||||||
|
(*abort thunk)))))))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
(define *shift
|
||||||
|
(lambda (f)
|
||||||
|
(call-with-current-continuation
|
||||||
|
(lambda (k)
|
||||||
|
(*abort (lambda ()
|
||||||
|
(f (lambda (v)
|
||||||
|
(reset (k v))))))))))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
;----------
|
||||||
|
;
|
||||||
|
;Reminder: reset specifies a control delimiter. shift grabs the current
|
||||||
|
;continuation up to the current control delimiter, and reifies it as a
|
||||||
|
;composable procedure. If the procedure is not used, shift has the
|
||||||
|
;effect of aborting up to the current control delimiter.
|
||||||
|
;
|
||||||
|
;Examples:
|
||||||
|
;
|
||||||
|
;(+ 10 (reset (+ 2 3)))
|
||||||
|
;-->
|
||||||
|
;15
|
||||||
|
;
|
||||||
|
;(+ 10 (reset (+ 2 (shift k 3))))
|
||||||
|
;-->
|
||||||
|
;13
|
||||||
|
;
|
||||||
|
;(+ 10 (reset (+ 2 (shift k (k 3)))))
|
||||||
|
;-->
|
||||||
|
;15
|
||||||
|
;
|
||||||
|
;(+ 10 (reset (+ 2 (shift k (+ 100 (k 3))))))
|
||||||
|
;-->
|
||||||
|
;115
|
||||||
|
;
|
||||||
|
;(+ 10 (reset (+ 2 (shift k (+ 100 (k (k 3)))))))
|
||||||
|
;-->
|
||||||
|
;117
|
||||||
|
;
|
||||||
|
;
|
||||||
|
;Other reminder: shift and reset are weaker than Matthias's control and
|
||||||
|
;prompt, in that they can be CPS-transformed.
|
||||||
|
;
|
||||||
|
;Have a happy holiday,
|
||||||
|
;
|
||||||
|
;-- Olivier
|
||||||
|
;
|
||||||
|
;PS: This definition is not unlike David Espinoza's implementation of monadic
|
||||||
|
;effects, ie, it has no interpretive or translation overhead.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
; JAR's notes:
|
||||||
|
;
|
||||||
|
; ; CWCC defined in terms of SHIFT
|
||||||
|
;
|
||||||
|
; (define cwcc
|
||||||
|
; (lambda (p)
|
||||||
|
; (shift k (k (p (lambda (x)
|
||||||
|
; (shift k1 (k x))))))))
|
||||||
|
;
|
||||||
|
; ; Monads from shift and reset (from Filinski, POPL '94)
|
||||||
|
;
|
||||||
|
; (define (reflect meaning)
|
||||||
|
; (shift k (extend k meaning)))
|
||||||
|
;
|
||||||
|
; (define (reify thunk)
|
||||||
|
; (reset (eta (thunk))))
|
||||||
|
;
|
||||||
|
; Example: nondeterminism monad.
|
||||||
|
;
|
||||||
|
; > (define (eta x) (list x))
|
||||||
|
; > (define (extend f l) (apply append (map f l)))
|
||||||
|
; >
|
||||||
|
; > (define-syntax amb
|
||||||
|
; (syntax-rules () ((amb ?x ?y) (*amb (lambda () ?x) (lambda () ?y)))))
|
||||||
|
;
|
||||||
|
; > (define (*amb t1 t2)
|
||||||
|
; (reflect (append (reify t1) (reify t2))))
|
||||||
|
; >
|
||||||
|
; > (reify (lambda () (amb 1 2)))
|
||||||
|
; '(1 2)
|
||||||
|
; > (reify (lambda () (+ (amb 1 2) 3)))
|
||||||
|
; '(4 5)
|
||||||
|
; >
|
||||||
|
; > (define cwcc call-with-current-continuation)
|
||||||
|
; > (reify (lambda ()
|
||||||
|
; (+ 1 (cwcc (lambda (k)
|
||||||
|
; (* 10 (amb 3 (k 4))))))))
|
||||||
|
; '(31 51)
|
||||||
|
; >
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue