scsh-0.6/scsh/procobj.scm

358 lines
13 KiB
Scheme

;;; Unix wait & process objects for scsh
;;; Copyright (c) 1993, 1994, 1995 by Olin Shivers.
;;; This is a GC'd abstraction for Unix process id's.
; ;; The problem with Unix pids is (a) they clutter up the kernel
;;; process table until you wait(2) them, and (b) you can only
;;; wait(2) them once. Scsh's process objects are similar, but
;;; allow the storage to be allocated in the scsh address space,
;;; and out of the kernel process table, and they can be waited on
;;; multiple times.
;;; Process objects
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
(define-record proc ; A process object
pid ; Proc's pid.
(finished? #f) ; Running, stopped, done
(status (make-placeholder)) ; The cached exit status of the process
(zombie #t) ; Misnomer. Whether or not the process has
; (not) been waited on.
;; Make proc objects print like #{proc 2318}.
((disclose p) (list "proc" (proc:pid p))))
;; Weak pointer tables. Much more efficient than populations.
;; Maps pids to processes. Unexited processes are strong pointers, exited
;; procs are weak pointers (to allow gc'ing).
(define process-table (make-integer-table))
(define (weak-table-ref t n)
(let ((r (table-ref t n)))
(if (weak-pointer? r)
(weak-pointer-ref r)
r)))
(define (weak-table-set! t n s)
(table-set! t n (make-weak-pointer s)))
(define (weaken-table-ref! t n)
(weak-table-set! t n (weak-table-ref t n)))
(define (maybe-pid->proc pid)
(weak-table-ref process-table pid))
(define (pid->proc pid . maybe-probe?)
(let ((probe? (:optional maybe-probe? #f)))
(or (maybe-pid->proc pid)
(case probe?
((#f) (error "Pid has no corresponding process object" pid))
((create) (let ((p (make-proc pid))) ; Install a new one.
;; Weak because we don't know what's up with this thing.
(weak-table-set! process-table pid p)
p))
(else #f)))))
;;; Coerce pids and procs to procs.
(define (->proc proc/pid)
(cond ((proc? proc/pid) proc/pid)
((and (integer? proc/pid) (>= proc/pid 0))
(pid->proc proc/pid))
(else (error "Illegal parameter" ->proc proc/pid))))
;;; Is X a pid or a proc?
(define (pid/proc? x) (or (proc? x) (and (integer? x) (>= x 0))))
;;; Process reaping
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;;; "Reaping" a process means using wait(2) to move its exit status from the
;;; kernel's process table into scsh, thus cleaning up the kernel's process
;;; table and saving the value in a gc'd data structure, where it can be
;;; referenced multiple times.
;;;
;;; - Stopped processes are never reaped, only dead ones. (May change -df)
;;;
;;; - Stopped process status codes are never cached in proc objects,
;;; only status codes for dead processes. So you can wait for a
;;; dead process multiple times, but only once per process-stop.
;;; (May change -df)
;;;
;;; - Unfortunately, reaping a process loses the information specifying its
;;; process group, so if a process is reaped into scsh, it cannot be
;;; waited for by WAIT-PROCESS-GROUP. Notice that only dead processes are
;;; reaped, not suspended ones. Programs almost never use WAIT-PROCESS-GROUP
;;; to wait for dead processes, so this is not likely to be a problem. If
;;; it is, turn autoreaping off with (autoreap-policy #f).
;;; (This never worked right, and it might be wiped out completely -fd)
;;;
;;; - Reaping can be encouraged by calling (REAP-ZOMBIES).
;;; (autoreap-policy [new-policy])
;;; Watch this area
(define *autoreap-policy* #f) ; Not exported from this module.
(define (autoreap-policy . maybe-policy)
(let ((old-policy *autoreap-policy*))
(if (pair? maybe-policy)
(let ((new-policy (car maybe-policy)))
(cond ((pair? (cdr maybe-policy))
(error "Too many args to autoreap-policy" maybe-policy))
((not (memq new-policy '(early #f)))
(error "Illegal autoreap policy." new-policy))
(else (set! *autoreap-policy* new-policy)
(if (eq? new-policy 'early)
(set! procobj-handler
(lambda (enabled-ints) (reap-zombies))))))))
old-policy))
;;; New (scsh 0.6)
(define (install-autoreaping)
(set! procobj-handler
(lambda (enabled-ints)
(reap-zombies))))
;;; (reap-zombies) => bool
;;; Move any zombies from the kernel process table into scsh.
;;; Return true if no more outstanding children; #f if some still live.
(define (reap-zombies)
(display "reap-zombies was called" (current-error-port))
(newline)
(let lp ()
(receive (pid status) (%wait-any (bitwise-ior wait/poll wait/stopped-children))
(if pid
(begin (add-reaped-proc! pid status)
; (format (current-error-port)
; "Reaping ~d[~d]~%" pid status)
(lp))
status))))
(define (new-child-proc pid)
(let ((proc (make-proc pid)))
(table-set! process-table pid proc)
proc))
(define (mark-proc-exited proc)
(weaken-table-ref! process-table (proc:pid proc)))
;;; (WAIT proc/pid [flags])
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;;; (wait proc/pid [flags]) => status or #f
;;;
;;; FLAGS (default 0) is the exclusive or of the following:
;;; wait/poll
;;; Return #f immediately if there are no
;;; unwaited children available.
;;; wait/stopped-children
;;; Report on suspended children as well.
;;;
;;; If the process hasn't terminated (or suspended, if wait/stopped
;;; is set) and wait/poll is set, return #f.
;;; (I'm working on the flags -df)
(define (wait pid/proc . maybe-flags)
(let* ((flags (:optional maybe-flags 0))
(proc (->proc pid/proc))
(win (lambda (status)
(mark-proc-waited! proc) ; Not eligible for a WAIT-ANY
status)))
(if (or (zero? (bitwise-and flags wait/poll))
(proc:finished? proc))
(win (placeholder-value (proc:status proc)))
(proc:finished? proc))))
;;; Another way to do it:
;;; Every time we reap a process, we pop out of our SIGCHLD
;;; block so that we can service an interrupt if the system
;;; so wishes.
;(define (wait/pid pid)
; ((let lp ()
; (blocking signal/chld
; (or (waited pid) ; Previously waited or reaped
; (receive (next-dead status) (reap-a-pid)
; (if (= pid next-dead) (lambda () status)
; lp)))))))
;The above seems to use Olin's event model. Even so, I'm not
;sure that's the best way to do that.
;Generally correct idea, tho
(define (cache-wait-status proc status)
(cond ((and (integer? status)
(not (status:stop-sig status))) ; He's dead, Jim.
(placeholder-set! (proc:status proc) status) ; Cache exit status.
(mark-proc-exited proc))) ; We're now gc'able.
status)
;;; (wait-any [flags]) => [proc status]
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;;; [#f #f] => non-blocking, none ready.
;;; [#f #t] => no more.
(define (wait-any . maybe-flags)
(let ((flags (:optional maybe-flags 0)))
(if (zero? (bitwise-and flags wait/poll))
(let ((win (get-reaped-proc!)))
(values win (placeholder-value (proc:status win))))
;The rest of this is quite crude and can be safely ignored. -df
(if (maybe-obtain-lock reaped-proc-pop-lock)
(if (eq? reaped-proc-head reaped-proc-tail)
(begin
(release-lock reaped-proc-pop-lock)
(values #f #f))
(let* ((retnode (placeholder-value reaped-proc-head))
(retval (weak-pointer-ref (reaped-proc:proc retnode))))
(set! reaped-proc-head (reaped-proc:next retnode))
(release-lock reaped-proc-pop-lock)
(if retval
(values retval (placeholder-value (proc:status retval)))
(values #f #f))
(values #f #f)))))))
;;; (wait-process-group [proc-group flags]) => [proc status]
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;;; [#f #f] => non-blocking, none ready.
;;; [#f #t] => no more.
;;;
;;;
;;; If you are doing process-group waits, you do *not* want to use
;;; early autoreaping, since the reaper loses process-group information.
;;; (I'm working on it -df)
(define (wait-process-group . args)
(let-optionals args ((proc-group 0) (flags 0))
(let ((proc-group (cond ((integer? proc-group) proc-group)
((proc? proc-group) (proc:pid proc-group))
(else (error "Illegal argument" wait-process-group
proc-group)))))
(receive (pid status) (%wait-process-group proc-group flags)
(if pid
(let ((proc (pid->proc pid)))
(cache-wait-status proc status)
(values proc status))
(values pid status)))))) ; pid = #f -- Empty poll.
;;; (%wait-any flags) (%wait-pid pid flags) (%wait-process-group pgrp flags)
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;;; Direct interfaces to waitpid(2) call.
;;; [#f #f] means no processes ready on a non-blocking wait.
;;; [#f #t] means no waitable process on wait-any.
(define (%wait-pid pid flags)
(let lp ()
(receive (err pid status) (%wait-pid/errno pid flags)
(cond ((not err) (and (not (zero? pid)) status)) ; pid=0 => none ready.
((= err errno/intr) (lp))
(else (errno-error err %wait-pid pid flags))))))
(define (%wait-any flags)
(let lp ()
(receive (err pid status) (%wait-pid/errno -1 flags)
(cond (err (cond ((= err errno/child) (values #f #t)) ; No more.
((= err errno/intr) (lp))
(else (errno-error err %wait-any flags))))
((zero? pid) (values #f #f)) ; None ready.
(else (values pid status))))))
(define (%wait-process-group pgrp flags)
(let lp ()
(receive (err pid status) (%wait-pid/errno (- pgrp) flags)
(cond (err (cond ((= err errno/child) (values #f #t)) ; No more.
((= err errno/intr) (lp))
(else (errno-error err %wait-process-group pgrp flags))))
((zero? pid) (values #f #f)) ; None ready.
(else (values pid status))))))
;;; Reaped process table
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;;; We keep track of procs that have been reaped but not yet waited on by
;;; the user's code. These proces are eligible for return by WAIT-ANY.
;;; We keep track of these so that WAIT-ANY will hand them out exactly once.
;;; What this code needs is traditional condition variables.
;;; This is (so far) reliable in the following ways:
;;; 1. No process will be returned twice by wait-any, ever. Even two different
;;; wait-anys.
;;; 2. Being un-reaped will not prevent garbage collection.
;;; (actually, there seems to be a problem with this -df)
;;; 3. If a process is waited on, or is gc'ed, wait-any will do the Right
;;; Thing.
;;; And UNreliable in the following ways:
;;; 1. If a wait and a wait-any are blocking simultaneously, the wait will
;;; always return the object. However, whether the wait-any will or not
;;; is based on racing semaphores.
;;; 2. While processes can still be garbage collected, the nodes on the
;;; wait-any list will not, and if the program never wait-any's, the queue
;;; will snake around, eating up memory like pac-man with the munchies.
;;; 3. The process may be garbage collected before wait-any gets to it, and
;;; that's just tough.
;;; -df
(define-record reaped-proc
proc
(next (make-placeholder))
prev)
(define reaped-proc-tail (make-placeholder))
(define reaped-proc-head reaped-proc-tail)
(define reaped-proc-push-lock (make-lock))
(define reaped-proc-pop-lock (make-lock)) ;;; Zippy sez: pop lock!
(define (push-reaped-proc proc)
(obtain-lock reaped-proc-push-lock)
(let ((push-me (make-reaped-proc (make-weak-pointer proc) reaped-proc-tail)))
(placeholder-set! reaped-proc-tail push-me)
; (add-finalizer! proc (lambda ignore (remove-reaped-proc push-me)))
(set! reaped-proc-tail (reaped-proc:next push-me)))
(release-lock reaped-proc-push-lock))
(define (remove-reaped-proc reaped-proc)
(spawn (lambda () ;This is blocking, so should run by itself
(placeholder-set! (reaped-proc:prev reaped-proc)
(placeholder-value
(reaped-proc:next reaped-proc))))
"reaped-proc-removing-thread"))
(define (pop-reaped-proc)
(obtain-lock reaped-proc-pop-lock) ;;; pop lock pop lock pop lock!
(let ((pop-me (placeholder-value reaped-proc-head)))
(set! reaped-proc-head (reaped-proc:next pop-me))
(release-lock reaped-proc-pop-lock)
(weak-pointer-ref (reaped-proc:proc pop-me))))
(define (add-reaped-proc! pid status)
(cond ((maybe-pid->proc pid) =>
(lambda (proc)
(placeholder-set! (proc:status proc) status)
(set-proc:finished? proc #t)
(push-reaped-proc proc)
(mark-proc-exited proc))
(else (warn "Exiting child pid has no proc object." pid status)))))
;;; Pop one off the list.
(define (get-reaped-proc!)
(let loop ((try (pop-reaped-proc)))
(if (and try (proc:zombie try))
try
(loop (pop-reaped-proc)))))
;;; PROC no longer eligible to be in the list. Delete it.
(define (mark-proc-waited! proc)
(set-proc:zombie proc #f))