scsh-0.6/scsh/lib/cset-lib.scm

805 lines
28 KiB
Scheme
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

;;; SRFI-14 character-sets library -*- Scheme -*-
;;;
;;; - Ported from MIT Scheme runtime by Brian D. Carlstrom.
;;; - Massively rehacked & extended by Olin Shivers 6/98.
;;; - Massively redesigned and rehacked 5/2000 during SRFI process.
;;; At this point, the code bears the following relationship to the
;;; MIT Scheme code: "This is my grandfather's axe. My father replaced
;;; the head, and I have replaced the handle." Nonetheless, we preserve
;;; the MIT Scheme copyright:
;;; Copyright (c) 1988-1995 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
;;; The MIT Scheme license is a "free software" license. See the end of
;;; this file for the tedious details.
;;; Exports:
;;; char-set? char-set= char-set<=
;;; char-set-hash
;;; char-set-cursor char-set-ref char-set-cursor-next end-of-char-set?
;;; char-set-fold char-set-unfold char-set-unfold!
;;; char-set-for-each char-set-map
;;; char-set-copy char-set
;;;
;;; list->char-set string->char-set
;;; list->char-set! string->char-set!
;;;
;;; filterchar-set ucs-range->char-set ->char-set
;;; filterchar-set! ucs-range->char-set!
;;;
;;; char-set->list char-set->string
;;;
;;; char-set-size char-set-count char-set-contains?
;;; char-set-every char-set-any
;;;
;;; char-set-adjoin char-set-delete
;;; char-set-adjoin! char-set-delete!
;;;
;;; char-set-complement char-set-union char-set-intersection
;;; char-set-complement! char-set-union! char-set-intersection!
;;;
;;; char-set-difference char-set-xor char-set-diff+intersection
;;; char-set-difference! char-set-xor! char-set-diff+intersection!
;;;
;;; char-set:lower-case char-set:upper-case char-set:title-case
;;; char-set:letter char-set:digit char-set:letter+digit
;;; char-set:graphic char-set:printing char-set:whitespace
;;; char-set:iso-control char-set:punctuation char-set:symbol
;;; char-set:hex-digit char-set:blank char-set:ascii
;;; char-set:empty char-set:full
;;; Imports
;;; This code has the following non-R5RS dependencies:
;;; - ERROR
;;; - %LATIN1->CHAR %CHAR->LATIN1
;;; - LET-OPTIONALS* and :OPTIONAL macros for parsing, checking & defaulting
;;; optional arguments from rest lists.
;;; - BITWISE-AND for CHAR-SET-HASH
;;; - The SRFI-19 DEFINE-RECORD-TYPE record macro
;;; - A simple CHECK-ARG procedure:
;;; (lambda (pred val caller) (if (not (pred val)) (error val caller)))
;;; This is simple code, not great code. Char sets are represented as 256-char
;;; strings. If char I is ASCII/Latin-1 0, then it isn't in the set; if char I
;;; is ASCII/Latin-1 1, then it is in the set.
;;; - Should be rewritten to use bit strings or byte vecs.
;;; - Is Latin-1 specific. Would certainly have to be rewritten for Unicode.
;;; See the end of the file for porting and performance-tuning notes.
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
(define-record-type :char-set
(make-char-set s)
char-set?
(s char-set:s))
(define (%string-copy s) (substring s 0 (string-length s)))
;;; Parse, type-check & default a final optional BASE-CS parameter from
;;; a rest argument. Return a *fresh copy* of the underlying string.
;;; The default is the empty set. The PROC argument is to help us
;;; generate informative error exceptions.
(define (%default-base maybe-base proc)
(if (pair? maybe-base)
(let ((bcs (car maybe-base))
(tail (cdr maybe-base)))
(if (null? tail)
(if (char-set? bcs) (%string-copy (char-set:s bcs))
(error "BASE-CS parameter not a char-set" proc bcs))
(error "Expected final base char set -- too many parameters"
proc maybe-base)))
(make-string 256 (%latin1->char 0))))
;;; If CS is really a char-set, do CHAR-SET:S, otw report an error msg on
;;; behalf of our caller, PROC. This procedure exists basically to provide
;;; explicit error-checking & reporting.
(define (%char-set:s/check cs proc)
(let lp ((cs cs))
(if (char-set? cs) (char-set:s cs)
(lp (error "Not a char-set" cs proc)))))
;;; These internal functions hide a lot of the dependency on the
;;; underlying string representation of char sets. They should be
;;; inlined if possible.
(define (si=0? s i) (zero? (%char->latin1 (string-ref s i))))
(define (si=1? s i) (not (si=0? s i)))
(define c0 (%latin1->char 0))
(define c1 (%latin1->char 1))
(define (si s i) (%char->latin1 (string-ref s i)))
(define (%set0! s i) (string-set! s i c0))
(define (%set1! s i) (string-set! s i c1))
;;; These do various "s[i] := s[i] op val" operations -- see
;;; %CHAR-SET-ALGEBRA. They are used to implement the various
;;; set-algebra procedures.
(define (setv! s i v) (string-set! s i (%latin1->char v))) ; SET to a Value.
(define (%not! s i v) (setv! s i (- 1 v)))
(define (%and! s i v) (if (zero? v) (%set0! s i)))
(define (%or! s i v) (if (not (zero? v)) (%set1! s i)))
(define (%minus! s i v) (if (not (zero? v)) (%set0! s i)))
(define (%xor! s i v) (if (not (zero? v)) (setv! s i (- 1 (si s i)))))
(define (char-set-copy cs)
(make-char-set (%string-copy (%char-set:s/check cs char-set-copy))))
(define (char-set= . rest)
(or (null? rest)
(let* ((cs1 (car rest))
(rest (cdr rest))
(s1 (%char-set:s/check cs1 char-set=)))
(let lp ((rest rest))
(or (not (pair? rest))
(and (string=? s1 (%char-set:s/check (car rest) char-set=))
(lp (cdr rest))))))))
(define (char-set<= . rest)
(or (null? rest)
(let ((cs1 (car rest))
(rest (cdr rest)))
(let lp ((s1 (%char-set:s/check cs1 char-set<=)) (rest rest))
(or (not (pair? rest))
(let ((s2 (%char-set:s/check (car rest) char-set<=))
(rest (cdr rest)))
(if (eq? s1 s2) (lp s2 rest) ; Fast path
(let lp2 ((i 255)) ; Real test
(if (< i 0) (lp s2 rest)
(and (<= (si s1 i) (si s2 i))
(lp2 (- i 1))))))))))))
;;; Hash
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;;; Compute (c + 37 c + 37^2 c + ...) modulo BOUND, with sleaze thrown in
;;; to keep the intermediate values small. (We do the calculation with just
;;; enough bits to represent BOUND, masking off high bits at each step in
;;; calculation. If this screws up any important properties of the hash
;;; function I'd like to hear about it. -Olin)
;;;
;;; If you keep BOUND small enough, the intermediate calculations will
;;; always be fixnums. How small is dependent on the underlying Scheme system;
;;; we use a default BOUND of 2^22 = 4194304, which should hack it in
;;; Schemes that give you at least 29 signed bits for fixnums. The core
;;; calculation that you don't want to overflow is, worst case,
;;; (+ 65535 (* 37 (- bound 1)))
;;; where 65535 is the max character code. Choose the default BOUND to be the
;;; biggest power of two that won't cause this expression to fixnum overflow,
;;; and everything will be copacetic.
(define (char-set-hash cs . maybe-bound)
(let* ((bound (:optional maybe-bound 4194304 (lambda (n) (and (integer? n)
(exact? n)
(<= 0 n)))))
(bound (if (zero? bound) 4194304 bound)) ; 0 means default.
(s (%char-set:s/check cs char-set-hash))
;; Compute a 111...1 mask that will cover BOUND-1:
(mask (let lp ((i #x10000)) ; Let's skip first 16 iterations, eh?
(if (>= i bound) (- i 1) (lp (+ i i))))))
(let lp ((i 255) (ans 0))
(if (< i 0) (modulo ans bound)
(lp (- i 1)
(if (si=0? s i) ans
(bitwise-and mask (+ (* 37 ans) i))))))))
(define (char-set-contains? cs char)
(si=1? (%char-set:s/check cs char-set-contains?)
(%char->latin1 (check-arg char? char char-set-contains?))))
(define (char-set-size cs)
(let ((s (%char-set:s/check cs char-set-size)))
(let lp ((i 255) (size 0))
(if (< i 0) size
(lp (- i 1) (+ size (si s i)))))))
(define (char-set-count pred cset)
(check-arg procedure? pred char-set-count)
(let ((s (%char-set:s/check cset char-set-count)))
(let lp ((i 255) (count 0))
(if (< i 0) count
(lp (- i 1)
(if (and (si=1? s i) (pred (%latin1->char i)))
(+ count 1)
count))))))
;;; -- Adjoin & delete
(define (%set-char-set set proc cs chars)
(let ((s (%string-copy (%char-set:s/check cs proc))))
(for-each (lambda (c) (set s (%char->latin1 c)))
chars)
(make-char-set s)))
(define (%set-char-set! set proc cs chars)
(let ((s (%char-set:s/check cs proc)))
(for-each (lambda (c) (set s (%char->latin1 c)))
chars))
cs)
(define (char-set-adjoin cs . chars)
(%set-char-set %set1! char-set-adjoin cs chars))
(define (char-set-adjoin! cs . chars)
(%set-char-set! %set1! char-set-adjoin! cs chars))
(define (char-set-delete cs . chars)
(%set-char-set %set0! char-set-delete cs chars))
(define (char-set-delete! cs . chars)
(%set-char-set! %set0! char-set-delete! cs chars))
;;; Cursors
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;;; Simple implementation. A cursors is an integer index into the
;;; mark vector, and -1 for the end-of-char-set cursor.
;;;
;;; If we represented char sets as a bit set, we could do the following
;;; trick to pick the lowest bit out of the set:
;;; (count-bits (xor (- cset 1) cset))
;;; (But first mask out the bits already scanned by the cursor first.)
(define (char-set-cursor cset)
(%char-set-cursor-next cset 256 char-set-cursor))
(define (end-of-char-set? cursor) (< cursor 0))
(define (char-set-ref cset cursor) (%latin1->char cursor))
(define (char-set-cursor-next cset cursor)
(check-arg (lambda (i) (and (integer? i) (exact? i) (<= 0 i 255))) cursor
char-set-cursor-next)
(%char-set-cursor-next cset cursor char-set-cursor-next))
(define (%char-set-cursor-next cset cursor proc) ; Internal
(let ((s (%char-set:s/check cset proc)))
(let lp ((cur cursor))
(let ((cur (- cur 1)))
(if (or (< cur 0) (si=1? s cur)) cur
(lp cur))))))
;;; -- for-each map fold unfold every any
(define (char-set-for-each proc cs)
(check-arg procedure? proc char-set-for-each)
(let ((s (%char-set:s/check cs char-set-for-each)))
(let lp ((i 255))
(cond ((>= i 0)
(if (si=1? s i) (proc (%latin1->char i)))
(lp (- i 1)))))))
(define (char-set-map proc cs)
(check-arg procedure? proc char-set-map)
(let ((s (%char-set:s/check cs char-set-map))
(ans (make-string 256 c0)))
(let lp ((i 255))
(cond ((>= i 0)
(if (si=1? s i)
(%set1! ans (%char->latin1 (proc (%latin1->char i)))))
(lp (- i 1)))))
(make-char-set ans)))
(define (char-set-fold kons knil cs)
(check-arg procedure? kons char-set-fold)
(let ((s (%char-set:s/check cs char-set-fold)))
(let lp ((i 255) (ans knil))
(if (< i 0) ans
(lp (- i 1)
(if (si=0? s i) ans
(kons (%latin1->char i) ans)))))))
(define (char-set-every pred cs)
(check-arg procedure? pred char-set-every)
(let ((s (%char-set:s/check cs char-set-every)))
(let lp ((i 255))
(or (< i 0)
(and (or (si=0? s i) (pred (%latin1->char i)))
(lp (- i 1)))))))
(define (char-set-any pred cs)
(check-arg procedure? pred char-set-any)
(let ((s (%char-set:s/check cs char-set-any)))
(let lp ((i 255))
(and (>= i 0)
(or (and (si=1? s i) (pred (%latin1->char i)))
(lp (- i 1)))))))
(define (%char-set-unfold! proc p f g s seed)
(check-arg procedure? p proc)
(check-arg procedure? f proc)
(check-arg procedure? g proc)
(let lp ((seed seed))
(cond ((not (p seed)) ; P says we are done.
(%set1! s (%char->latin1 (f seed))) ; Add (F SEED) to set.
(lp (g seed)))))) ; Loop on (G SEED).
(define (char-set-unfold p f g seed . maybe-base)
(let ((bs (%default-base maybe-base char-set-unfold)))
(%char-set-unfold! char-set-unfold p f g bs seed)
(make-char-set bs)))
(define (char-set-unfold! p f g seed base-cset)
(%char-set-unfold! char-set-unfold! p f g
(%char-set:s/check base-cset char-set-unfold!)
seed)
base-cset)
;;; list <--> char-set
(define (%list->char-set! chars s)
(for-each (lambda (char) (%set1! s (%char->latin1 char)))
chars))
(define (char-set . chars)
(let ((s (make-string 256 c0)))
(%list->char-set! chars s)
(make-char-set s)))
(define (list->char-set chars . maybe-base)
(let ((bs (%default-base maybe-base list->char-set)))
(%list->char-set! chars bs)
(make-char-set bs)))
(define (list->char-set! chars base-cs)
(%list->char-set! chars (%char-set:s/check base-cs list->char-set!))
base-cs)
(define (char-set->list cs)
(let ((s (%char-set:s/check cs char-set->list)))
(let lp ((i 255) (ans '()))
(if (< i 0) ans
(lp (- i 1)
(if (si=0? s i) ans
(cons (%latin1->char i) ans)))))))
;;; string <--> char-set
(define (%string->char-set! str bs proc)
(check-arg string? str proc)
(do ((i (- (string-length str) 1) (- i 1)))
((< i 0))
(%set1! bs (%char->latin1 (string-ref str i)))))
(define (string->char-set str . maybe-base)
(let ((bs (%default-base maybe-base string->char-set)))
(%string->char-set! str bs string->char-set)
(make-char-set bs)))
(define (string->char-set! str base-cs)
(%string->char-set! str (%char-set:s/check base-cs string->char-set!)
string->char-set!)
base-cs)
(define (char-set->string cs)
(let* ((s (%char-set:s/check cs char-set->string))
(ans (make-string (char-set-size cs))))
(let lp ((i 255) (j 0))
(if (< i 0) ans
(let ((j (if (si=0? s i) j
(begin (string-set! ans j (%latin1->char i))
(+ j 1)))))
(lp (- i 1) j))))))
;;; -- UCS-range -> char-set
(define (%ucs-range->char-set! lower upper error? bs proc)
(check-arg (lambda (x) (and (integer? x) (exact? x) (<= 0 x))) lower proc)
(check-arg (lambda (x) (and (integer? x) (exact? x) (<= lower x))) upper proc)
(if (and (< lower upper) (< 256 upper) error?)
(error "Requested UCS range contains unavailable characters -- this implementation only supports Latin-1"
proc lower upper))
(let lp ((i (- (min upper 256) 1)))
(cond ((<= lower i) (%set1! bs i) (lp (- i 1))))))
(define (ucs-range->char-set lower upper . rest)
(let-optionals* rest ((error? #f) rest)
(let ((bs (%default-base rest ucs-range->char-set)))
(%ucs-range->char-set! lower upper error? bs ucs-range->char-set)
(make-char-set bs))))
(define (ucs-range->char-set! lower upper error? base-cs)
(%ucs-range->char-set! lower upper error?
(%char-set:s/check base-cs ucs-range->char-set!)
ucs-range->char-set)
base-cs)
;;; -- predicate -> char-set
(define (%char-set-filter! pred ds bs proc)
(check-arg procedure? pred proc)
(let lp ((i 255))
(cond ((>= i 0)
(if (and (si=1? ds i) (pred (%latin1->char i)))
(%set1! bs i))
(lp (- i 1))))))
(define (char-set-filter predicate domain . maybe-base)
(let ((bs (%default-base maybe-base char-set-filter)))
(%char-set-filter! predicate
(%char-set:s/check domain char-set-filter!)
bs
char-set-filter)
(make-char-set bs)))
(define (char-set-filter! predicate domain base-cs)
(%char-set-filter! predicate
(%char-set:s/check domain char-set-filter!)
(%char-set:s/check base-cs char-set-filter!)
char-set-filter!)
base-cs)
;;; {string, char, char-set, char predicate} -> char-set
(define (->char-set x)
(cond ((char-set? x) x)
((string? x) (string->char-set x))
((char? x) (char-set x))
(else (error "->char-set: Not a charset, string or char." x))))
;;; Set algebra
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;;; The exported ! procs are "linear update" -- allowed, but not required, to
;;; side-effect their first argument when computing their result. In other
;;; words, you must use them as if they were completely functional, just like
;;; their non-! counterparts, and you must additionally ensure that their
;;; first arguments are "dead" at the point of call. In return, we promise a
;;; more efficient result, plus allowing you to always assume char-sets are
;;; unchangeable values.
;;; Apply P to each index and its char code in S: (P I VAL).
;;; Used by the set-algebra ops.
(define (%string-iter p s)
(let lp ((i (- (string-length s) 1)))
(cond ((>= i 0)
(p i (%char->latin1 (string-ref s i)))
(lp (- i 1))))))
;;; String S represents some initial char-set. (OP s i val) does some
;;; kind of s[i] := s[i] op val update. Do
;;; S := S OP CSETi
;;; for all the char-sets in the list CSETS. The n-ary set-algebra ops
;;; all use this internal proc.
(define (%char-set-algebra s csets op proc)
(for-each (lambda (cset)
(let ((s2 (%char-set:s/check cset proc)))
(let lp ((i 255))
(cond ((>= i 0)
(op s i (si s2 i))
(lp (- i 1)))))))
csets))
;;; -- Complement
(define (char-set-complement cs)
(let ((s (%char-set:s/check cs char-set-complement))
(ans (make-string 256)))
(%string-iter (lambda (i v) (%not! ans i v)) s)
(make-char-set ans)))
(define (char-set-complement! cset)
(let ((s (%char-set:s/check cset char-set-complement!)))
(%string-iter (lambda (i v) (%not! s i v)) s))
cset)
;;; -- Union
(define (char-set-union! cset1 . csets)
(%char-set-algebra (%char-set:s/check cset1 char-set-union!)
csets %or! char-set-union!)
cset1)
(define (char-set-union . csets)
(if (pair? csets)
(let ((s (%string-copy (%char-set:s/check (car csets) char-set-union))))
(%char-set-algebra s (cdr csets) %or! char-set-union)
(make-char-set s))
(char-set-copy char-set:empty)))
;;; -- Intersection
(define (char-set-intersection! cset1 . csets)
(%char-set-algebra (%char-set:s/check cset1 char-set-intersection!)
csets %and! char-set-intersection!)
cset1)
(define (char-set-intersection . csets)
(if (pair? csets)
(let ((s (%string-copy (%char-set:s/check (car csets) char-set-intersection))))
(%char-set-algebra s (cdr csets) %and! char-set-intersection)
(make-char-set s))
(char-set-copy char-set:full)))
;;; -- Difference
(define (char-set-difference! cset1 . csets)
(%char-set-algebra (%char-set:s/check cset1 char-set-difference!)
csets %minus! char-set-difference!)
cset1)
(define (char-set-difference cs1 . csets)
(if (pair? csets)
(let ((s (%string-copy (%char-set:s/check cs1 char-set-difference))))
(%char-set-algebra s csets %minus! char-set-difference)
(make-char-set s))
(char-set-copy cs1)))
;;; -- Xor
(define (char-set-xor! cset1 . csets)
(%char-set-algebra (%char-set:s/check cset1 char-set-xor!)
csets %xor! char-set-xor!)
cset1)
(define (char-set-xor . csets)
(if (pair? csets)
(let ((s (%string-copy (%char-set:s/check (car csets) char-set-xor))))
(%char-set-algebra s (cdr csets) %xor! char-set-xor)
(make-char-set s))
(char-set-copy char-set:empty)))
;;; -- Difference & intersection
(define (%char-set-diff+intersection! diff int csets proc)
(for-each (lambda (cs)
(%string-iter (lambda (i v)
(if (not (zero? v))
(cond ((si=1? diff i)
(%set0! diff i)
(%set1! int i)))))
(%char-set:s/check cs proc)))
csets))
(define (char-set-diff+intersection! cs1 cs2 . csets)
(let ((s1 (%char-set:s/check cs1 char-set-diff+intersection!))
(s2 (%char-set:s/check cs2 char-set-diff+intersection!)))
(%string-iter (lambda (i v) (if (zero? v)
(%set0! s2 i)
(if (si=1? s2 i) (%set0! s1 i))))
s1)
(%char-set-diff+intersection! s1 s2 csets char-set-diff+intersection!))
(values cs1 cs2))
(define (char-set-diff+intersection cs1 . csets)
(let ((diff (string-copy (%char-set:s/check cs1 char-set-diff+intersection)))
(int (make-string 256 c0)))
(%char-set-diff+intersection! diff int csets char-set-diff+intersection)
(values (make-char-set diff) (make-char-set int))))
;;;; System character sets
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;;; These definitions are for Latin-1.
;;;
;;; If your Scheme implementation allows you to mark the underlying strings
;;; as immutable, you should do so -- it would be very, very bad if a client's
;;; buggy code corrupted these constants.
(define char-set:empty (char-set))
(define char-set:full (char-set-complement char-set:empty))
(define char-set:lower-case
(let* ((a-z (ucs-range->char-set #x61 #x7B))
(latin1 (ucs-range->char-set! #xdf #xf7 #t a-z))
(latin2 (ucs-range->char-set! #xf8 #x100 #t latin1)))
(char-set-adjoin! latin2 (%latin1->char #xb5))))
(define char-set:upper-case
(let ((A-Z (ucs-range->char-set #x41 #x5B)))
;; Add in the Latin-1 upper-case chars.
(ucs-range->char-set! #xd8 #xdf #t
(ucs-range->char-set! #xc0 #xd7 #t A-Z))))
(define char-set:title-case char-set:empty)
(define char-set:letter
(let ((u/l (char-set-union char-set:upper-case char-set:lower-case)))
(char-set-adjoin! u/l
(%latin1->char #xaa) ; FEMININE ORDINAL INDICATOR
(%latin1->char #xba)))) ; MASCULINE ORDINAL INDICATOR
(define char-set:digit (string->char-set "0123456789"))
(define char-set:hex-digit (string->char-set "0123456789abcdefABCDEF"))
(define char-set:letter+digit
(char-set-union char-set:letter char-set:digit))
(define char-set:punctuation
(let ((ascii (string->char-set "!\"#%&'()*,-./:;?@[\\]_{}"))
(latin-1-chars (map %latin1->char '(#xA1 ; INVERTED EXCLAMATION MARK
#xAB ; LEFT-POINTING DOUBLE ANGLE QUOTATION MARK
#xAD ; SOFT HYPHEN
#xB7 ; MIDDLE DOT
#xBB ; RIGHT-POINTING DOUBLE ANGLE QUOTATION MARK
#xBF)))) ; INVERTED QUESTION MARK
(list->char-set! latin-1-chars ascii)))
(define char-set:symbol
(let ((ascii (string->char-set "$+<=>^`|~"))
(latin-1-chars (map %latin1->char '(#x00A2 ; CENT SIGN
#x00A3 ; POUND SIGN
#x00A4 ; CURRENCY SIGN
#x00A5 ; YEN SIGN
#x00A6 ; BROKEN BAR
#x00A7 ; SECTION SIGN
#x00A8 ; DIAERESIS
#x00A9 ; COPYRIGHT SIGN
#x00AC ; NOT SIGN
#x00AE ; REGISTERED SIGN
#x00AF ; MACRON
#x00B0 ; DEGREE SIGN
#x00B1 ; PLUS-MINUS SIGN
#x00B4 ; ACUTE ACCENT
#x00B6 ; PILCROW SIGN
#x00B8 ; CEDILLA
#x00D7 ; MULTIPLICATION SIGN
#x00F7)))) ; DIVISION SIGN
(list->char-set! latin-1-chars ascii)))
(define char-set:graphic
(char-set-union char-set:letter+digit char-set:punctuation char-set:symbol))
(define char-set:whitespace
(list->char-set (map %latin1->char '(#x09 ; HORIZONTAL TABULATION
#x0A ; LINE FEED
#x0B ; VERTICAL TABULATION
#x0C ; FORM FEED
#x0D ; CARRIAGE RETURN
#x20 ; SPACE
#xA0))))
(define char-set:printing (char-set-union char-set:whitespace char-set:graphic)) ; NO-BREAK SPACE
(define char-set:blank
(list->char-set (map %latin1->char '(#x09 ; HORIZONTAL TABULATION
#x20 ; SPACE
#xA0)))) ; NO-BREAK SPACE
(define char-set:iso-control
(ucs-range->char-set! #x7F #xA0 #t (ucs-range->char-set 0 32)))
(define char-set:ascii (ucs-range->char-set 0 128))
;;; Porting & performance-tuning notes
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;;; See the section at the beginning of this file on external dependencies.
;;;
;;; First and foremost, rewrite this code to use bit vectors of some sort.
;;; This will give big speedup and memory savings.
;;;
;;; - LET-OPTIONALS* macro.
;;; This is only used once. You can rewrite the use, port the hairy macro
;;; definition (which is implemented using a Clinger-Rees low-level
;;; explicit-renaming macro system), or port the simple, high-level
;;; definition, which is less efficient.
;;;
;;; - :OPTIONAL macro
;;; Very simply defined using an R5RS high-level macro.
;;;
;;; Implementations that can arrange for the base char sets to be immutable
;;; should do so. (E.g., Scheme 48 allows one to mark a string as immutable,
;;; which can be used to protect the underlying strings.) It would be very,
;;; very bad if a client's buggy code corrupted these constants.
;;;
;;; There is a fair amount of argument checking. This is, strictly speaking,
;;; unnecessary -- the actual body of the procedures will blow up if an
;;; illegal value is passed in. However, the error message will not be as good
;;; as if the error were caught at the "higher level." Also, a very, very
;;; smart Scheme compiler may be able to exploit having the type checks done
;;; early, so that the actual body of the procedures can assume proper values.
;;; This isn't likely; this kind of compiler technology isn't common any
;;; longer.
;;;
;;; The overhead of optional-argument parsing is irritating. The optional
;;; arguments must be consed into a rest list on entry, and then parsed out.
;;; Function call should be a matter of a few register moves and a jump; it
;;; should not involve heap allocation! Your Scheme system may have a superior
;;; non-R5RS optional-argument system that can eliminate this overhead. If so,
;;; then this is a prime candidate for optimising these procedures,
;;; *especially* the many optional BASE-CS parameters.
;;;
;;; Note that optional arguments are also a barrier to procedure integration.
;;; If your Scheme system permits you to specify alternate entry points
;;; for a call when the number of optional arguments is known in a manner
;;; that enables inlining/integration, this can provide performance
;;; improvements.
;;;
;;; There is enough *explicit* error checking that *all* internal operations
;;; should *never* produce a type or index-range error. Period. Feel like
;;; living dangerously? *Big* performance win to be had by replacing string
;;; and record-field accessors and setters with unsafe equivalents in the
;;; code. Similarly, fixnum-specific operators can speed up the arithmetic
;;; done on the index values in the inner loops. The only arguments that are
;;; not completely error checked are
;;; - string lists (complete checking requires time proportional to the
;;; length of the list)
;;; - procedure arguments, such as char->char maps & predicates.
;;; There is no way to check the range & domain of procedures in Scheme.
;;; Procedures that take these parameters cannot fully check their
;;; arguments. But all other types to all other procedures are fully
;;; checked.
;;;
;;; This does open up the alternate possibility of simply *removing* these
;;; checks, and letting the safe primitives raise the errors. On a dumb
;;; Scheme system, this would provide speed (by eliminating the redundant
;;; error checks) at the cost of error-message clarity.
;;;
;;; In an interpreted Scheme, some of these procedures, or the internal
;;; routines with % prefixes, are excellent candidates for being rewritten
;;; in C.
;;;
;;; It would also be nice to have the ability to mark some of these
;;; routines as candidates for inlining/integration.
;;;
;;; See the comments preceding the hash function code for notes on tuning
;;; the default bound so that the code never overflows your implementation's
;;; fixnum size into bignum calculation.
;;;
;;; All the %-prefixed routines in this source code are written
;;; to be called internally to this library. They do *not* perform
;;; friendly error checks on the inputs; they assume everything is
;;; proper. They also do not take optional arguments. These two properties
;;; save calling overhead and enable procedure integration -- but they
;;; are not appropriate for exported routines.
;;; Copyright notice
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;;; Copyright (c) 1988-1995 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
;;;
;;; This material was developed by the Scheme project at the Massachusetts
;;; Institute of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering and
;;; Computer Science. Permission to copy and modify this software, to
;;; redistribute either the original software or a modified version, and
;;; to use this software for any purpose is granted, subject to the
;;; following restrictions and understandings.
;;;
;;; 1. Any copy made of this software must include this copyright notice
;;; in full.
;;;
;;; 2. Users of this software agree to make their best efforts (a) to
;;; return to the MIT Scheme project any improvements or extensions that
;;; they make, so that these may be included in future releases; and (b)
;;; to inform MIT of noteworthy uses of this software.
;;;
;;; 3. All materials developed as a consequence of the use of this
;;; software shall duly acknowledge such use, in accordance with the usual
;;; standards of acknowledging credit in academic research.
;;;
;;; 4. MIT has made no warrantee or representation that the operation of
;;; this software will be error-free, and MIT is under no obligation to
;;; provide any services, by way of maintenance, update, or otherwise.
;;;
;;; 5. In conjunction with products arising from the use of this material,
;;; there shall be no use of the name of the Massachusetts Institute of
;;; Technology nor of any adaptation thereof in any advertising,
;;; promotional, or sales literature without prior written consent from
;;; MIT in each case.