;;; The SRFI-?? sort package -- sorted predicates
;;; Olin Shivers 10/98.
;;;
;;; (list-sorted? < lis) -> boolean
;;; (vector-sorted? < v [start end]) -> boolean

(define (list-sorted? < list)
  (or (not (pair? list))
      (let lp ((prev (car list)) (tail (cdr list)))
	(or (not (pair? tail))
	    (let ((next (car tail)))
	      (and (not (< next prev))
		   (lp next (cdr tail))))))))

(define (vector-sorted? elt< v . maybe-start+end)
  (call-with-values
   (lambda () (vector-start+end v maybe-start+end))
   (lambda (start end)
     (or (>= start end)			; Empty range
	 (let lp ((i (+ start 1)) (vi-1 (vector-ref v start)))
	   (or (>= i end)
	       (let ((vi (vector-ref v i)))
		 (and (not (elt< vi vi-1))
		      (lp (+ i 1) vi)))))))))

;;; Copyright and porting non-notices
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;;; Give me a break. It's fifteen lines of code. I place this code in the
;;; public domain; help yourself.
;;;
;;; If your Scheme has a faster mechanism for handling optional arguments
;;; (e.g., Chez), you should definitely port over to it. Note that argument
;;; defaulting and error-checking are interleaved -- you don't have to
;;; error-check defaulted START/END args to see if they are fixnums that are
;;; legal vector indices for the corresponding vector, etc.