9 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
sperber	a3f0a3ffb9	Add new leap second, submitted by SRFI author.	2005-12-26 10:44:34 +00:00
mainzelm	abd81132dc	comment fix: x->char-set does not accept char predicates	2005-10-18 15:02:46 +00:00
mainzelm	84f85be750	Merge from S48 repository ... Original commit message from Mike Sperber: Subject: Add implementation of FOR-EACH to SRFI-1 This was missing from Olin's reference implementation. Note that currently, the native versions of MAP and FOR-EACH already implement the extended semantics specified by SRFI 1. However, we might want to enforce the R5RS restrictions to MAP and FOR-EACH at some time in the future, so it still makes sense to have separate implementations in SRFI 1.	2004-02-26 16:20:53 +00:00
mainzelm	f344e2be87	Fixed bug in STRING-CONCATENATE-REVERSE/SHARED reported by Francisco ... Solsona at srfi-13@srfi.schemers.org on 12 Feb 2004.	2004-02-17 07:47:41 +00:00
mainzelm	252e390354	Replaced the original MIT license with a new BSD-style license. ... Chris Hanson from MIT Scheme granted the new license in a private email on 12 Dec 2003. In addition, I added a private email from Olin, saying that the MIT code has nothing in common with MIT Scheme anymore.	2004-01-27 14:36:28 +00:00
mainzelm	d1b1c3dee3	Replaced the original MIT license with a new BSD-style license. ... Chris Hanson from MIT Scheme granted the new license in a private email on 12 Dec 2003.	2004-01-27 14:33:39 +00:00
mainzelm	90ea0cf502	Fixed implementation of STRING-CONTAINS by using the commented out ... "slow & simple" version instead of calling the KMP searcher. See http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-13/post-mail-archive/msg00003.html I fixed the mentioned "off-by-one error" by using <= instead of < at the termination check.	2004-01-13 15:37:35 +00:00
mainzelm	b1cc92b55f	Added SRFI-42	2003-10-24 08:34:38 +00:00
mainzelm	3e397f65c5	GC_PROTECT some variables.	2003-05-01 10:21:33 +00:00