From 3b5b139efa120272c2096e2ba86fd81f46109614 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lassi Kortela <lassi@lassi.io>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 21:08:18 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Initial commit

---
 document.md | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 document.md

diff --git a/document.md b/document.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..060055f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/document.md
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+# SR 2022-1: Scheme Review
+
+## Author
+
+Lassi Kortela
+
+## Status
+
+Living document
+
+## Abstract
+
+This document defines the current Scheme Review process. It is
+expected to change indefinitely as the process changes.
+
+## Rationale
+
+Scheme Review was started as a response to the success and
+shortcomings of the SRFI (Scheme Requests for Implementation) process.
+SRFI is over 20 years old so a lot of evidence has been accumulated.
+
+What has worked well with SRFI:
+
+* Everything is public. Transparency builds trust.
+
+* Drafts are announced. Keeps regulars active.
+
+* Separation between authors and reviewers. Provides a good balance
+  between authorial control and accountability to the community.
+
+What has caused trouble:
+
+* Tight focus on "Requests for Implementation" coupled with the fact
+  that anyone can send new proposals has resulted in a flow of
+  experimental work that has not had time to mature.
+
+* Many interesting proposals are either fit into the process like
+  square pegs into a round hole (with sub-par results), or left
+  outside the process (devoid of the attention they deserve).
+
+* Tight deadlines commonly fly by. (90 days is not a lot.)
+
+## Specification
+
+[Meant to reflect the current state of things. Not meant to be
+finalized.]
+
+Each proposal has one or more authors.
+
+The proposal starts when the authors submit a first draft.
+
+The proposal is submitted as a git repo. (Currently hosted at
+`gitea.scheme.org/review`.)
+
+The authors are free to send any number of additional drafts.
+
+The authors are free to add more co-authors for later drafts.
+
+### Proposal ID
+
+Each proposal is uniquely identified by an ID of the form `YYYY-N`
+where:
+
+* `YYYY` is the four-digit year when the first draft was received, and
+
+* `N` is a running number covering all proposals started in the same
+year.
+
+The running number starts from `1` since there are some problems with
+SRFI numbers starting from zero. (Hard to remember that SRFI 0 exits;
+programs cannot use 0 to mean "none".)
+
+The running numbers are monotonically increasing within a given year,
+but it's permissible for there to be gaps in the numbering.
+
+It is expected that many proposals take more than a year to finish. No
+matter how many years it takes, the proposal is still identified by
+the year when the first draft was sent.