conservatory
/
picrin
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[workaround] traverse_seq is broken, use traverse_shared instead

This commit is contained in:
Yuichi Nishiwaki 2014-02-19 01:14:49 +09:00
parent d5e27e0949
commit 844f25b5c1
1 changed files with 1 additions and 41 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

42
src/write.c
View File

@ -109,46 +109,6 @@ traverse_shared(struct writer_control *p, pic_value obj)
} }
} }
static void
traverse_seq(struct writer_control *p, pic_value obj)
{
xh_entry *e;
size_t i;
switch (pic_type(obj)) {
case PIC_TT_PAIR:
case PIC_TT_VECTOR:
e = xh_get(p->labels, pic_obj_ptr(obj));
if (e == NULL) {
xh_put(p->labels, pic_obj_ptr(obj), -1);
}
else if (e->val == -1) {
xh_put(p->labels, pic_obj_ptr(obj), p->cnt++);
break;
}
else {
break;
}
if (pic_pair_p(obj)) {
traverse_seq(p, pic_car(p->pic, obj));
traverse_seq(p, pic_cdr(p->pic, obj));
}
else {
for (i = 0; i < pic_vec_ptr(obj)->len; ++i) {
traverse_seq(p, pic_vec_ptr(obj)->data[i]);
}
}
xh_del(p->labels, pic_obj_ptr(obj));
assert(xh_get(p->labels, pic_obj_ptr(obj)) == NULL);
break;
default:
/* pass */
break;
}
}
static void write_core(struct writer_control *p, pic_value); static void write_core(struct writer_control *p, pic_value);
static void static void
@ -360,7 +320,7 @@ write(pic_state *pic, pic_value obj, XFILE *file)
p = writer_control_new(pic, file); p = writer_control_new(pic, file);
traverse_seq(p, obj); traverse_shared(p, obj); /* FIXME */
write_core(p, obj); write_core(p, obj);